foxhounds: (Default)
foxhounds ([personal profile] foxhounds) wrote2015-08-08 08:15 pm
Entry tags:

the general - night one.


THE GENERAL night one



Instead of waking up in the jungle, you wake up elsewhere. This is the square where The General comes to decide what to do, and Ivan patiently sits on a bench. Each of you has your own foxhound who's barking happily to welcome you. They'll help you find who you choose to hunt tonight.

After all, you're saving them.

You have a little while to discuss who you'll hunt tonight, but don't linger too long, since you only have until dawn.


rulebook
character statuses
profiles

All night votes will be due August 10th by 5PM EST
hopefragment: until he wanted us to stand ON him (he seemed like such a stand-up guy*)

[personal profile] hopefragment 2015-08-09 02:39 am (UTC)(link)
...Yeah, exactly. Especially if everyone's going to be forced to vote, after this...

We can't leave any evidence, and we have to make sure that it can't be traced to us.
unrulyprincess: (Thou surly boil-brained strumpet!)

[personal profile] unrulyprincess 2015-08-09 02:40 am (UTC)(link)
...They will be more desperate. Abstaining from voting is no longer an option, so...

[People will be desperate to find the culprit.]

The only positive part of this situation I can see if that they are still not yet aware there are more of us than only one.
hopefragment: definitely not thinking about boobs (thinking carefully*)

[personal profile] hopefragment 2015-08-09 03:31 am (UTC)(link)
I don't know about that. Gi-ne mentioned that Hazama suspected there's more than one of us... a General and foxhounds.

Though I'm hoping that maybe they'll hear these guys, [BARK BARK BARK DOGS,] and think they're literally dogs, instead of a group of people, like us.
unrulyprincess: (Thou errant shard-borne foot-licker!)

[personal profile] unrulyprincess 2015-08-09 04:02 am (UTC)(link)
[BARK BARK DOGS]

In either situation, it is dangerous if they assume there is more than one of us from the start.

But even so... do you not think the person charged to protect them would pick one of them?
hopefragment: (and then we ordered and waited*)

[personal profile] hopefragment 2015-08-09 04:13 am (UTC)(link)
Depends on who that is. "Rainsford..." It could be any of them.

No matter what, there's definitely a chance that someone could be protected. If we can figure out Rainsford, then... we'll have a much better chance in the future, when there's fewer people.

But I definitely agree. We can't go with obvious people, not tonight. Which means...

[Who, exactly? Gotta think.]